Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-06-2017, 10:10 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 682
|
92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
witch engine LT 1 or L31 would you choose , stock , Give me your opinions . and why you would choose one over the other ,
|
04-06-2017, 11:29 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,798
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
Quote:
But the L31 is a better design from a service/dependability point of view. The Optispark is the LT1's weak spot, and they're not being manufactured new by GM, meaning that your options are aftermarket or remanufactured, which run close to $500. I think you'll be happier with the L31 in the long run. The L31 is going in my Blazer. |
|
04-06-2017, 11:52 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 682
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2017, 12:13 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,798
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
The ported ones (that's what I have) are much more reliable, but they're still the weak link. I have almost 160,000 on mine, but I know it's eventually going to cost big bucks to keep it going.
If you plan to eventually modify the engine, I think the Vortec L31 gives you more options as well. |
04-11-2017, 10:56 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: between AZ & NV
Posts: 67
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
i ve had two '93 firebirds, one with year matching and one with a 96. They are a dogs compared to everything else ive driven (BBC, PONTIAC 455). The opti**** "distributor" is a joke beyond any doubt. No idea how they came up with such a silly and unreliable design. The rubber grommet next to the throttle body cracked and wouldnt let the engine fire. Vortec is way more reliable than LT1.
"oh yea lets mount it under the water pump because electricity and water are a great combo". - GM in late '91 Yea they like to rev high and have little torque compared to the 350 Vortec. Both my birds had terrible launch from deadstop compared to my 87 longbed that i swapped an L31 into.
__________________
*UNDER CONSTRUCTION* '80 Suburban C20 (C6P) (Silverado) - '68 472 (Edelbrock 1813, PH8026 LT's, H pipe) / '91 4L80 (manual shift,vac modulator, 350 converter) / 14B FF 3.21 G80 34' s/ '96 GMT400 interior |
04-12-2017, 12:45 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 682
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
Big thumbs up on being a Firechicken man , And I have oredered a GM L31 R Vortec there was a Ls1 newly rebuilt in my area for a good price that is why I asked the question after reading about the LS1 I went with the vortec thanks though for the insight, My first car witch I still own , I Painted a house for it in 1975 long story to how I got it but it is a very rare 69 Firechicken convertable with the T/A package..... II dont even like to make this public cause the offers on do you want to sell it become insanly re lent less . 20 years ago where I use to reside I had to litterly fence my intire property in and buy a guard dog just because of the walk up offers that would bang on my door............ but anyhow I am firebird guy also
|
04-30-2017, 08:04 PM | #7 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: between AZ & NV
Posts: 67
|
Re: 92-97 LT 1 vs L31 vortec
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
*UNDER CONSTRUCTION* '80 Suburban C20 (C6P) (Silverado) - '68 472 (Edelbrock 1813, PH8026 LT's, H pipe) / '91 4L80 (manual shift,vac modulator, 350 converter) / 14B FF 3.21 G80 34' s/ '96 GMT400 interior |
||
Bookmarks |
|
|