The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevy/GMC Suburbans & Panels Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2015, 10:23 AM   #1
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

I think I may need to replace my shocks but I'm not sure how to define what to get. The previous owner said it was lowered ~3", but I don't count on it and I believe it has lowered shocks.

1) how can I tell how much it was lowered?
2) how do I pick a shock that helps the ride: reduce sway & bounce but smooth?
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 11:14 AM   #2
4shongo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 315
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

I have a 3"/4" drop on mine and yours looks pretty close. I have CPP lowered shocks on mine and they work great.
4shongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2015, 01:25 PM   #3
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4shongo View Post
I have a 3"/4" drop on mine and yours looks pretty close. I have CPP lowered shocks on mine and they work great.
Do you know the distance between hub center and fender? One thread said 16-3/4" for 5" drop.

Did you drop with springs only or spindles?
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2015, 08:46 PM   #4
Advanced Design
Senior Member
 
Advanced Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 7,017
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

If the shocks are not bottoming out, I would pull one front and one rear off then measure compressed and extended length. A good parts store can locate a replacement based on that information. Shock company websites usually provide the information as well.

I need to do the same for my Burb too. It is a little bouncy and rough riding. The guys at Ridetech offered to set me up. Good shocks I think though a little spendy.
Advanced Design is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2015, 08:12 AM   #5
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Good info, thanks.

My hub to wheel well is only 16" in the front. Does that mean I more than a 5" drop?

I will spend some time this weekend looking at the springs and such to see if I can quantify the drop. Any ideas on how, would be appreciated.
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2015, 10:30 PM   #6
Advanced Design
Senior Member
 
Advanced Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 7,017
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Measuring from wheel well down has the variable of tire size and body bushing collapse that will change the measurement. It would probably give you some idea to compare your to a stock Suburban that has no spring sag.

Newer trucks ride height in front is determined by measuring from the lower control arm bushing center to the floor and by measuring the distance from bottom of the spindle to floor then subtracting for the difference. This is the Z height and the service information gives a spec for this. I went through a 69 service manual located here ...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...194&styleid=63
Looking for the same it isn't there. You might have more luck.

Unless the springs have a tag on them I don't know how you can tell what they are.
Advanced Design is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2015, 09:38 PM   #7
72MARIO
Registered User
 
72MARIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,052
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Dont forget to relocate the rear shock if its lowered any amount. Having shock relocates is the best improvement you can make.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017
1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck
1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck"
2005 TAHOE DD
72MARIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2015, 09:58 AM   #8
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MARIO View Post
Dont forget to relocate the rear shock if its lowered any amount. Having shock relocates is the best improvement you can make.
relocate? where to? I have a shock with a dent, is that why?
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2015, 10:02 AM   #9
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

I did some snooping this weekend:

1) Unless the springs have been replaced, I think there is one less turn (6T) than stock (7T).
2) I pulled some numbers off the existing shock but couldn't find any references online.
3) Very little static distance above rubber bumper (~1" or 2)

Can y'all see anything pertinent in the pic?
Attached Images
 
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2015, 08:19 AM   #10
72MARIO
Registered User
 
72MARIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,052
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451200

Have a look at this.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017
1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck
1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck"
2005 TAHOE DD
72MARIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2015, 09:28 AM   #11
highwinger
Registered User
 
highwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 297
Re: Shocks for lowered, not bagged 69 burb

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MARIO View Post
Thanks Mario, great link.

Some things I found with it:
1) Mine are right at the stated max 30deg angle.
2) My lower brackets don't support the shock on both sides.
3) It seems I need to extend the lower bracket so the axle doesn't hit the shocks.
4) shock length as sitting is ~13-1/4".
5) I counted the spring turns, don't recall now but I think 5 or 6. They don't appear to be cut since they have smaller turn radius on the upper & lower ends.

More questions of course:
1) What's the best shock angle?
2) It seems moving the lower bracket and leaving the upper would clear the axle. Is there a reason to move both?
Attached Images
 
highwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com