The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2008, 12:16 PM   #1
kamkam1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southeast missouri
Posts: 74
lunati bracketmaster II ??

Hi all, Who's using the lunati bracketmaster II cam 300/300 adv.duration and .515/.515 lift ? Do you like it and what's you combo. The reason I'm asking is because I wiped a lobe off my Chet Herbert cam and I can get a deal on the lunati from a good friend. My combo is 355 cu. .125 dome speed-pros, 441 heads, weiand 7546 manifold, hooker super-comps, 10 inch convertor, th 350, 373's in a 68 swb. Comp-ratio is about 9.3-1, is this cam to BIG ??
__________________
Kirk Myers


68 chevy swb owned since 87, under the knife
71 skylark 9.20's @ 76mph 1/8 mile
kamkam1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 01:05 PM   #2
lowriden58
Registered User
 
lowriden58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chesapeake Beach, MD
Posts: 812
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

that cam sounds a bit on the large side for your setup IMO. also i would stay away from a 300/300 type duration. you want more of a "split" duration. like say 284/296 or so to get a nice choppy idle
__________________
71 cheyenne lwb 300rwhp
best 1/4 time so far 12.8 @103

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z...en58/001-2.jpg
lowriden58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 02:53 PM   #3
Alex1
Registered User
 
Alex1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,156
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

what is the duration at 0.50?
Alex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 12:57 PM   #4
kamkam1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southeast missouri
Posts: 74
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

Thanks for the replies. Duration @ .050 is 246/246. The cam thats in the engine now is 228/234 @.050 and .480 int./.494 exh. Chet Herbert brand. I like this cam alot,it sounds wicked and pulls awesome, but #7 exh. lobe has been rounded off. As I said the lunati is brand new cam and lifter kit for $50.
__________________
Kirk Myers


68 chevy swb owned since 87, under the knife
71 skylark 9.20's @ 76mph 1/8 mile
kamkam1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 01:11 PM   #5
lowriden58
Registered User
 
lowriden58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chesapeake Beach, MD
Posts: 812
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

that lunati cam wont sound anything like what you have now. as i stated above you need a split duration to get that nice lope
__________________
71 cheyenne lwb 300rwhp
best 1/4 time so far 12.8 @103

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z...en58/001-2.jpg
lowriden58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 03:26 PM   #6
Alex1
Registered User
 
Alex1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,156
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

This one will have a rougher idle. For $50 - I would try it.
Alex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2008, 11:58 PM   #7
swb85
On a budget like Fred Sanford
 
swb85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,031
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

Having a split duration isn't what gives a cam a lopey idle, it's the amount of valve overlap (amount of time int/exh valves are open simultaneously). I guarantee you that 246/246 lunati cam will sound nasty.
__________________
'85 Silverado swb: 383 stroker, 10.5:1, vortec heads, 232/238 roller cam, RPM air gap, performer 750 carb, stainless longtubes, 3" duals/super 44's, T56/4.11 383ci build / exterior refresh thread
'98 Camaro z28: 370ci twin turbo 370ci build
'01 Tahoe LT 4x4: 5.3, longtubes/ory, magnaflow duals, custom tune....wife's DD
swb85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 10:28 AM   #8
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

Kirk, We ran that Lunati #00012 cam your looking at in a buddy's street strip car. He had WAY more engine than you, and trust me,, it WILL be WAY too much cam for your combination IMO. I built Dana a 408 (400 +.040), Edelbrock 170cc E-tec heads, set compression right at 10.5:1, used a Edelbrock Vortec RPM air gap intake, One of Patricks XC carbs, Supercomps w/ 3" pipe through series-40 3" flowmasters., cheepie Jeggs 3500 stall convertor and a TH350 trans... Dana could drive 100 miles to Speedworld, change on a set of 27" slicks, click off 11.20's @ 117 in a 74 Nova , and then drive 100 miles home. That car was simply a freek of nature IMO.

Notable about all this... Vortec / Edelbrock E-tec heads are weak on the exhaust side and 'SHOULD' demand a split patern cam for (how is it they put it) for best performance. Just goes to prove that trying something 'different' isn't always a bad move. If you can afford to experiment, that's the only way you find things 'better'. But be prepared to have a 'Wall of Shame" for all those ideas that didn't work out so well.

With all that said, listen to swb85 is telling you,, It is valve timing that causes the cylinder to 'slobber' fuel and have inconsistant idle (lope). that cam is going to be a WILD sounding cam in a 9:1 350. Hope you don't have power brakes, or care about bottom end torque. Large cams like this have a late intake valve closing (even tho the #00012 is 4 degrees advanced) That generally causes a lower cylinder pressure (which is why it takes more static compression to support a long duration cam). Here's a link to the cam card for that #00012 cam. Liek swb85 said, look at the overlap of the intake valve opening before the exhaust valve closes. Intake opens 19° before top dead center, but exhaust doesn't close till 11° AFTER,, there is 30 crank degrees of both valves being open 0.050" or more. The overlap does a couple of things. It takes advantage of the exhaust flow out of the chamber to initialize flow of intake into the chamber. Of course at low engine speeds the exhaust isn't exiting the chamber at such supersonic speeds so some the the exhaust reverts up into the intake, spoiling the mixture, causing lean / inconsistant misfires at idle,,, aka LOPE. Go take a look at some of these "Thumper" cams and look at the overlap on those,, VERY much like this Bracket master!

As a BTW, what lowriden58 is saying (I believe just slightly mis-stated) is that a cam with a split duration typically has more exhaust duration, and in that ,,typically has the exhaust valve opening sooner (being a larger duration). Depending on how the cam designer decided to set up the lobe seperation, this WILL have an effect on how the cam sounds. The exhaust tone we hear is the expanding gasses escaping past the exhaust valve. If you have more exhaust duration, it only makes sense that you have to open the valve sooner. Opening the exhaust valve sooner is akin to opening the door in an explosion,, the more of that explosion is going to rush out the door instead of building up pressure INSIDE the chamber. Less pressure , less exhaust tone or 'pop' to the exhaust. The flip side of that is opening the door sooner allows more of the explosion to rush out and not put pressure on the piston. Exhaust valve timing has a HUGE effect on the sound we hear in the exhaust. Wether it will be crisper, sharper, louder, milder,,,, or in a direction you are looking for,, well get ready to hang some parts on that 'wall of shame' it it isn't

All this rambeling aside,, I am a HUGE opponent of using ANY used flat tappet cam. You have already lost a lobe or two in this motor. That debris from the lifters and cam is embedded in all if the engine bearings. That's the bearings job. The metal ground away from the cam and lofter is hard, VERY hard,, much harder than your crankshaft (assuming this is a cast crank) While your running this motor now with all these tiny particles embeded inthe bearings,,,,, it's slowly grinding away at the crankshaft. As you have proved, keeping a flat tappet cam alive these days (with the CRAP they are selling us for oil) is a hit and miss proposition. Your going to take a chance of sending MORE debris through the motor,,, over a couple of hundred dollars for a cam kit (new with liftrs). Not me,, no thanks! In fact I'd be pulling the motor to freshen the bearings, and then saving for a a hydraulic roller cam package.
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:06 PM   #9
kamkam1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southeast missouri
Posts: 74
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

Thanks for your replies. I am going to pass on the cheap deal and go with something milder.
__________________
Kirk Myers


68 chevy swb owned since 87, under the knife
71 skylark 9.20's @ 76mph 1/8 mile
kamkam1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 08:10 PM   #10
Outlaw72
Hay Team!!
 
Outlaw72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ft. Worth, TX, USA
Posts: 366
Re: lunati bracketmaster II ??

I had this exact camshaft in a SBC 408 and it was great other than the fact it needed an extra vaccum pump for the brakes. Vaccum is horrible...
__________________
1972 Chevrolet Cheyenne LWB "Orange and White" 8)
Outlaw72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com