The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2005, 11:52 AM   #1
8t5Silverado
Mudslides 'r my specialty
 
8t5Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
Any tips when looking to buy a 47-53?

Is there anything in particular I should look for?

All I know at the moment is that the truck is a 3/4 ton five window with a later model straight 6.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.)

http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339
8t5Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005, 09:24 PM   #2
Razor454
Registered User
 
Razor454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina
Posts: 341
Well, depends on what you want to do with it. Do you want to restore, leave as is, Hotrod or mild custom?
__________________
1967 SwB, 454 BB, 4L80E trans, 3.73 eaton posi

1997 C2500 Ext Cab 5.7 Liter

1955 3/4 ton 1st series w/ 235 straight six Sold it
Razor454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 11:34 AM   #3
solidaxel
Registered User
 
solidaxel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cactus Patch So. Az
Posts: 4,749
RUST in the lower parts and the total cost to complete, if you are going to keep it!!!
__________________
53 TuTone Extended Cab 350 4-Spd 3:08 (SOLD)
53 Chevy Moldy pearl green ZZ-4 4L60E 9" 3:25
55 GMC 1st Black Mll (ZZ4) ZZ6 TKO 600 5 sp 3:73
62 Solidaxle Corvette Roman Red (327
340hp 4spd 3:36) C4 & C5 suspension tube chassis
LS 3 4L70E
65 Corvette Coupe 327 350hp 4spd 4:11
78 Black Silverado SWB (350/350) 5.3 & 4L60E 3:42
2000 S-Type 3.0 (wife cruiser)
2003 GMC SCSB 5.3 4L60E 3:42
solidaxel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2005, 02:08 PM   #4
8t5Silverado
Mudslides 'r my specialty
 
8t5Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
Well, for the time being I think I will find some "non-split" steel wheels, paint em red, get it to pass inspection, and drive it.

I am thinking I will try to lower it a bit and just enjoy it.

Maybe in a few years I will update the front suspension, replace the rear with a modern one, drop in a SBC...I don't expect to ever fix it up to complete show quality.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.)

http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339
8t5Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2005, 06:29 PM   #5
JERRY COZADD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
hey guy's have a customer looking for front brake drums for his 41 chevy pu; 1/2 ton-6 lug- he is located in Hutchison,KS 67561, his name is Dan Maskil, telephone 1-620-422-5950,or reply to email address gertcozadd@yahoo.com, Thanks Jerry
JERRY COZADD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 12:57 PM   #6
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
The biggest problems are wheels and suspension upgrades. The AD has the tie rods behind the front axle, and requires wheels with about 3.5" setback to clear the tie rod ends. I've been looking for some GM rims for mine for about 8 years. I did put rims off a 91 on the rear, but the setback is more, and the tires have about an inch clearance to the frame. There are some white spoke trailer wheels that have the right spacing, but you can't mount the GM hubcaps on them.

Rear end gearing is 4.56. Only upgrade is the pumpkin from a 64-72 with 4.10 gears. If you want anything better, you swap the differential, which is about 4" narrower than the later models. Problem then is that with the newer wheels the tires almost rub on the fenders.

Front end- there is no easy way to swap a 3/4 ton ifs, the frame is too wide. And there are no easy swaps for disc brakes. You can put a 5 or 6 bolt ifs on, and go to a car or 1/2 ton rear end, but you lose the load capacity.

V8's aren't the easiest engine to put in, but it can be done. Steering gear has to move to the outside of the frame.

Over all, I recommend a 1/2 ton for a driver, it's less work. But the 3/4 tons sell for a lot less money, thanks to the lack of easy upgrades. I'm currently using my original 52 3/4 ton for a daily driver.
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2005, 12:58 PM   #7
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
Jerry - Try www.bowtiebits.com in Wichita.
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2005, 04:00 PM   #8
Phat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 105
Dont be too afraid of the 3/4 ton.Rust is the biggest cost factor Like Fred says they are cheaper. Now there is NO problem with 3/4 ton frames for IFS at all. Some vette rear kits wont fit but most other stuff will. As a matter of fact i rather like the 3/4 ton frame.(and the long box) They are straight all the way back and pretty tuff little buggers.
I think your best improvement would be the rear end. I know i have a completly stock GMC with just the rear and master cyl changed and love driving it local. Daul line master cyl would be my first deal if i was gonna drive it stock.This poor guy just would not let me change to a daul line master and he paid the price......,safety first than the fun stuff I know i cant spell worth a damn...............
Attached Images
 
Phat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2005, 05:39 PM   #9
TATE228
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: lake forest park, Washington
Posts: 257
rusr rust rust! rust is a huge problem with these trucks. my 52 is in such bad shape. i didn't look at it close enough when i bought it. if it's a solid truck i say go for it. just remember 5 windows bring the money so it might not be a good canidate to destroy with a v8 and ifs. sounds cool though.
__________________
-1971 K20 350/sm465
-2004 1500
TATE228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2005, 11:17 AM   #10
Hart_Rod
*************
 
Hart_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,827
How about a rust free one:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php3?t=154279

Rob
Hart_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com