The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2017, 10:56 AM   #1
Bmstd
Registered User
 
Bmstd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Riverside
Posts: 35
Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

I am starting on a new project where we are converting C60 to C10. We have an original 8000 mile fire truck tanker and are repurposing cab, hood, engine, and transmission to assemble a c10 swb.

For the chassis we want to stay with static drop, but wanted to call on some of the experience out there.

What is the lowest drop that can be done and still be "driveable" using static lowering parts?

We want to stay traditional and not cut up frame (other than c notch) if possible.

Can anyone share what has worked for them or are using currently including what manufacturers?
Bmstd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 11:43 AM   #2
Rich 5150 69
Registered User
 
Rich 5150 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Galt, Calif
Posts: 2,437
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

With out c-notch 3/4 drop, lower than that you can't carry anything with out bottoming out.
Attached Images
 
__________________
`64 C10 vortec 350/350/373 posi
`69 RS/SS 350/350/308
`37 Ford 406/350/324 traclock
`68 Dart 370/904/323 suregrip
Rich 5150 69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 03:40 PM   #3
62 short step
Senior Member
 
62 short step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwell Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 2,882
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

My truck is 5 1/2 in the front and 6 in the rear.

It could use a c-notch for the rear.
Attached Images
   
__________________
www.louisianaclassictruckclub.com


1965 c-10
86 chevy c/k 20
62 short step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 04:37 PM   #4
scoot_mcgrute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tigard, Or
Posts: 503
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

5/7 here. Plenty usable but I do need to install that c-notch as I only have roughly 3/4" uptravel. I only hit on big bumps though.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1966 Army Truck
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691778
scoot_mcgrute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 09:25 PM   #5
PGSigns
Senior Member
 
PGSigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Mine is 4 1/2 front and 5 1/2 in the rear and it is my daily driver and I use it as a truck.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131
Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need?
1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver
1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home
1965 Suburban
2003 3500 Duramax
2005 Ultra Classic
PGSigns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2017, 11:10 PM   #6
PatJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: cary ,NC
Posts: 31
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)



CPP drop spindles and drop springs
Porterbuilt C notch and rear drop springs

Not as low as I would like but its got a full bed and still fully functional.
__________________
Pat Jones
Cary, NC

64 Custom Cab Fleet
PatJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 09:00 AM   #7
raidmagic
Senior Member
 
raidmagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tampa, Fl.
Posts: 420
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Do any of you haul a trailer? This is on my list of things to do.
raidmagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 10:00 AM   #8
62 short step
Senior Member
 
62 short step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwell Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 2,882
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Quote:
Originally Posted by raidmagic View Post
Do any of you haul a trailer? This is on my list of things to do.
I don't, but if it was bagged maybe I would.
__________________
www.louisianaclassictruckclub.com


1965 c-10
86 chevy c/k 20
62 short step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 01:48 PM   #9
Magnimike1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62 short step View Post
My truck is 5 1/2 in the front and 6 in the rear.

It could use a c-notch for the rear.
I just bought a truck with a smash-hit bumper. Cool truck
Magnimike1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 04:06 PM   #10
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 46,644
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

The Mule is a 4 1/2 front and 6" rear. No C-notch. I have carried things, but you must go REAL slow and careful to not bottom out. I plan on a c-notch some day, I just have not stopped driving it enough to take time to do it.
Attached Images
     
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2017, 05:49 PM   #11
62 short step
Senior Member
 
62 short step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenwell Springs, Louisiana
Posts: 2,882
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnimike1 View Post
I just bought a truck with a smash-hit bumper. Cool truck
Thanks!
__________________
www.louisianaclassictruckclub.com


1965 c-10
86 chevy c/k 20
62 short step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2017, 12:43 PM   #12
raidmagic
Senior Member
 
raidmagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tampa, Fl.
Posts: 420
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palf70Step View Post
The Mule is a 4 1/2 front and 6" rear. No C-notch. I have carried things, but you must go REAL slow and careful to not bottom out. I plan on a c-notch some day, I just have not stopped driving it enough to take time to do it.
Great stance
raidmagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2017, 03:59 PM   #13
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,869
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Somewhere around where my old '66 sat was about as low as you can go static and still be drivable. There was only 1.5" between the inner fender and top of the front tire, and about 3" before the crossmember bottomed out. Small pipe notch in the rear, shorter than a bolt in notch to keep more frame strength. The diff will hit the bed floor before the axles use up all of a bolt-in notch, so I'd rather have a small pipe notch that keeps more of the frame rail height.





theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 11:51 PM   #14
Bmstd
Registered User
 
Bmstd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Riverside
Posts: 35
Re: Lowest Static Drop (But Functional)

Thanks everyone for your input. I really like the stance of theastronaut has on the 66. I am going to try to get in that low of a zone with static drop.

For what i want to accomplish, I think i will start with 2 1/2" drop spindles and then 3" drop springs out front. I may even get way over the top and order set of PB 1" narrow and 1" forward A-Arms to correct angles. In rear it sounds like 5" drop spring and up to 2" block will work the best. Looking at Dead End Garage C-Notch and track bar combo if i need the additional clearance for suspension travel.
Bmstd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com